Watcher of Weasels: The Council Has Spoken!

Recent Comments

tshuntong: You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more --[entry]

tshuntong: You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more --[entry]

tshuntong: You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more --[entry]

ST2010: Thanks for very interesting article. physical access control btw. I really enjoyed readin--[entry]

tshuntong: You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more --[entry]

tshuntong: You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more --[entry]

tshuntong: You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more --[entry]

tshuntong: You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more --[entry]

Stormwarning: Very nice, thank you for the nomination.--[entry]

zenpundit: Much thanks for the nomination!!--[entry]

Darren: It's an honor to be nominated. To whomever recommended my post: thank you.--[entry]

ST2010: Thanks for very interesting article. physical access control btw. I really enjoyed readin--[entry]

Tthomp: Listen to what this former CIA 22 year veteran says about our foreign policy. (He was the--[entry]

TThomp: I have no doubt that our actions in the middle east have helped to bring together the peo--[entry]

Watcher: Jolly Ronpauler... sorry, but no, I don't know what you mean. bbartlog... --[entry]

Darren: I'm honored to have gotten a vote--well, a third of a vote, anyway!--[entry]

Darren: I'm honored to have gotten a vote--well, a third of a vote, anyway!--[entry]

ST2010: Thanks for very interesting article. physical access control btw. I really enjoyed readin--[entry]

k2aggie07: Ack, I guess my submission wasn't in time! Nuts. My other article was a lot better.--[entry]

ST2010: Thanks for very interesting article. physical access control btw. I really enjoyed readin--[entry]

ST2010: Thanks for very interesting article. physical access control btw. I really enjoyed readin--[entry]

spree: I see I am listed here, this make me a weasel? LOL Actually wanted to stop in and say --[entry]

Debbie: Honored to be mentioned. Some great articles included this week, some I've already had t--[entry]

ST2010: Thanks for very interesting article. physical access control btw. I really enjoyed readin--[entry]

March 25, 2005

The Council Has Spoken!

First off... any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here, and here. Die spambots, die! And now... the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are Iraqi Bravery by Alpha Patriot, and 2 Years by Democracy in Iraq. All members, please be sure to link to both winning entries (and to the full results of the vote) in a post. Two members were unable to vote this week, but only The Moderate Voice was affected by the 2/3 vote penalty. Thanks to everyone for all the great entries this week... I'm eager to see next week's entries! Here are the full tallies of all votes cast:

Votes	Council link
2	Iraqi Bravery Alpha Patriot
1 1/3	About Last Night Little Red Blog
1 1/3	Of Science Fiction’s Dark Side Wallo World
1 1/3	Where Have All the Mothers Gone? Dr. Sanity
2/3	The “Slippery Slope”: Groningen To Terri Right Wing Nut House
2/3	Their Just Desserts King of Fools
2/3	Congress Acts on Terri The Sundries Shack
2/3	It's All About ‘Academic Freeeedom’!!! e-Claire
2/3	Union UnAccountability: The CTA Edition The Education Wonks

Votes	Non-council link
4	2 Years Democracy in Iraq
2	More on the Babe Theory of Political Movements. WILLisms
1	The View From the Front of the Bus Hog on Ice
2/3	Kennedy's Folly Coming Back To Haunt US Speech? Captain's Quarters
2/3	The Schiavo Case Dean's World
2/3	6000 BC A.E.Brain
1/3	The Politics of the Terri Schiavo Case Right Wing News
1/3	Kofi's Dollar Girls Captain's Quarters
1/3	Ted Kennedy and Frank Lautenberg Are Shocked, Shocked The Corner

I thought it would be best to leave out the entries that didn't receive any votes at all. The fractions come from the splitting of the votes... primary choices counted as 2/3 of a vote and secondary choices counted as 1/3. Both counts for primary and secondary choices were then added all together. I could have avoided using fractions, but it would have put the results on a completely different scale... I'd rather that the total reflect how many people actually voted. Please send any questions, comments, complaints, criticisms, crude insults, or thinly-veiled threats to this address.

Posted by Watcher at 04:01 AM |

The Watcher's Council

Comments (3)

I'm back... at a new URL and a slightly different name.

And if there's an Council opening... keep me in mind.

Posted by: Aaron's cc: at April 1, 2005 08:45 AM

Thanks for the heads-up.

Posted by: Watcher at April 6, 2005 01:20 PM

You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more about markup than anything. haha I should restrain myself from commenting in the wee hours of the morning and going on my own rant. cnlogistic A yes I do I agree with you. At the end of the day It’s all about mark up. winrelocation It’s what makes the difference.

Posted by: tshuntong at October 7, 2007 06:25 AM

Watcher of Weasels:

Keeping an eye on the weasels of the world

March 25, 2005

The Council Has Spoken!