August 12, 2005

The Council Has Spoken!

First off...  any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here,  and here.  Die spambots, die!  And now...  the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are Washington's Wasteful Ways: Alaskan Pork Chops by The Education Wonks, and Planned Parenthood Fantasizes About Blowing Up "Anti-Choicers" by The Dawn Patrol.  All members, please be sure to link to both winning entries (and to the full results of the vote) in a post.  Three members were unable to vote this week...  but only Wallo World was affected by the 2/3 vote penalty.  Thanks to everyone for all the great entries this week...  I'm eager to see next week's entries!  Here are the full tallies of all votes cast:

VotesCouncil link
2  2/3Washington's Wasteful Ways: Alaskan Pork Chops
The Education Wonks
2  1/3Guess What? Anatomy Is Destiny
Gates of Vienna
1Godwin’s Law, Mark II
The Sundries Shack
1Able Danger, Gorelick and 9-11
The Strata-Sphere
1Some Other Things the "Peace Bell" Should Be Tolling For
Right Wing Nut House
2/3Blog Bullshit Bingo
Dr. Sanity

VotesNon-council link
2Planned Parenthood Fantasizes About Blowing Up "Anti-Choicers"
The Dawn Patrol
1  1/3The Final Campaigns of WWII
Alpha Patriot
1  1/3Racism, Sexism on the Left
Villainous Company
1Pullout
Varifrank
2/3Rabbi Boteach Chokes on the Blue Pill
ArklahomBoy
2/3The Abu Zayd Letter
Chrenkoff
2/3Rest In Pieces
The Belmont Club
2/3Third Holiest, With a Bullet
AbbaGav
1/3Devoted Sports Fan Widows Self in Response to Plea for Sex
Hog on Ice
1/3How to Read an NIE
The American Thinker

I thought it would be best to leave out the entries that didn't receive any votes at all.  The fractions come from the splitting of the votes...  primary choices counted as 2/3 of a vote and secondary choices counted as 1/3.  Both counts for primary and secondary choices were then added all together.  I could have avoided using fractions, but it would have put the results on a completely different scale...  I'd rather that the total reflect how many people actually voted.  Please send any questions, comments, complaints, criticisms, crude insults, or thinly-veiled threats to this address

Comments (5)

Does it make you wonder about the person you gave the 10th place position to note that he blogs in favor of teaching intelligent design to innocent school children?

Evidently it is possible for one to hold ridiculous opinions on religion and yet think rationally about other topics, but if it's important that those of us who want to defend the US and the rest of the west against Islamist totalitarianism to distance outselves from the Christian brand of religious fanaticism, then couldn't The American Thinker be treated to a few judicious comments and engaged about his unthinking endorsement of cloaked creationism while thanking him for his thoughts about how to read an NIE?

Posted by: Juan Golblado at August 13, 2005 05:58 AM

Wow... how fucked up in the head do you have to be to complain that someone was allowed to even come in last place just because you didn't like the pro-ID opinions of other people at the same group blog?

Posted by: Watcher at August 13, 2005 12:10 PM

This guys blog is interesting and weaselesque. http://manifestunclaimed.blogspot.com

Posted by: Ed at May 14, 2006 08:39 AM

You actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more about markup than anything. haha I should restrain myself from commenting in the wee hours of the morning and going on my own rant. cnlogistic A yes I do I agree with you. At the end of the day It’s all about mark up. winrelocation It’s what makes the difference.

Posted by: tshuntong at October 7, 2007 07:15 AM

top antispywares top anti-spywares best spywares

Posted by: best anti spywares at November 18, 2007 06:25 AM
Post a comment
Remember personal info?