December 02, 2005
The Council Has Spoken!
First off... any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here, and here. Die spambots, die! And now... the winning entries in the Watcher's Council vote for this week are Guns, Germs, and Moonbats by Right Wing Nut House, and The New York Times on Iraq, 1993-2005 by American Future. All members, please be sure to link to both winning entries (and to the full results of the vote) in a post. Wallo World was the only member unable to vote this week, and the only member affected by the 2/3 vote penalty. Thanks to everyone for all the great entries this week... I'm eager to see next week's entries! Here are the full tallies of all votes cast:
| Votes | Council link |
|---|---|
| 2 2/3 | Guns, Germs, and Moonbats Right Wing Nut House |
| 1 2/3 | Discussing Withdrawal From Iraq The Glittering Eye |
| 1 | The Irony of the Day The Education Wonks |
| 1 | Son Of Able Danger The Strata-Sphere |
| 2/3 | "Decisional Autonomy" and the Constitution New World Man |
| 2/3 | Unfair, Unbalanced, and Off the Wall Gates of Vienna |
| 2/3 | "Whose Side Are They On" Example #3: The Washington Post Editors The Sundries Shack |
| 1/3 | Commandments, Commissions, and Cinematic Christians Wallo World |
| 1/3 | The Glass Is Always Half Full Dr. Sanity |
| 1/3 | Three Years Celibacy -- A Good Requirement Rhymes With Right |
| Votes | Non-council link |
|---|---|
| 2 2/3 | The New York Times on Iraq, 1993-2005 American Future |
| 1 2/3 | From the Law Offices of Dewey, Cheatam and Howe Varifrank |
| 1 1/3 | Refuting Objections To Coercive Interrogations Ace of Spades HQ |
| 1 1/3 | No Bibles For Prisoners At Gitmo Always On Watch |
| 1 | Mesh This Power Line |
| 1 | Leadership in a World of Narcissists ShrinkWrapped |
| 2/3 | John Locke, Fearless Philosopher Fearless Philosophy For Free Minds |
| 1/3 | Herding Cats into a Quagmire Politechnical Institute |
I thought it would be best to leave out the entries that didn't receive any votes at all. The fractions come from the splitting of the votes... primary choices counted as 2/3 of a vote and secondary choices counted as 1/3. Both counts for primary and secondary choices were then added all together. I could have avoided using fractions, but it would have put the results on a completely different scale... I'd rather that the total reflect how many people actually voted. Please send any questions, comments, complaints, criticisms, crude insults, or thinly-veiled threats to this address
Thanks for very interesting article. physical access control btw. I really enjoyed reading all of your posts. garment manufacturer It’s interesting to read ideas, and observations from someone else’s point of view… makes you think more. So please keep up the great work. Greetings. fingerprint scanner
Posted by: ST2010 at October 5, 2007 01:05 PMYou actually have a good point now that I look at it that way. This was article was more about markup than anything. haha I should restrain myself from commenting in the wee hours of the morning and going on my own rant. cnlogistic A yes I do I agree with you. At the end of the day It’s all about mark up. winrelocation It’s what makes the difference.
Posted by: tshuntong at October 7, 2007 07:55 AM|
Remember personal info?
|
|
|
