dymphna: no, not a quota, just a tad more equitable. It took me awhile to notice that we didn't ha--[entry]

Watcher: I didn't realize that i had to meet a wimmin quota! :-(--[entry]

dymphna: How come we don't have more gurrls? Since Dr. Sanity and e claire are gone, there's is ju--[entry]

Jack: Thanks for the link.--[entry]

harrison: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /archives/001607.html on this server. A--[entry]

Watcher: I dunno... it's working for me now. Still having trouble?--[entry]

harrison: Is it just me, or is it that Andrew's link seems broken? --[entry]

Urban Infidel: Love your site! Here's a perfect weasel story for you! If you have a moment, pleas--[entry]

harrison: The report puts all the onus on the Iraqi government to achieve "milestones", but paradox--[entry]

Angus macFergus: I was surprised Rummy wasnt fired after the 04 election. It was clear we were NOT winning--[entry]

Rod Stanton: Had we won the war the Baker group would have been superfluous. W and Rummy ignored a wel--[entry]

soccer dad: Elder of Ziyon and Treppenwitz who both have won for non-council post are among the entri--[entry]

Slayer: Used to have a watcher from the watcher's council...before the attack in 2004 when the co--[entry]

Watcher: Sure, that's what we're here for! :-)--[entry]

Tito: Thanks for the vote (and the plug)! I'm not really sure what this blog (watcher) is al--[entry]

Larry: I humbly thank whoever it was that voted for me. It was an honor to be considered.--[entry]

Jamie Spencer: Thanks for the laugh, I needed one...--[entry]

uadjet: applying for Watchers Council. Thanks.--[entry]

Watcher: LOL... sorry, I must have been using that New Math. ;-) I fixed it. --[entry]

RhymesWithRight: Shouldn't that be the 73rd anniversary of the end of Prohibition?--[entry]

mark safranski: Hey guys, much appreciated !--[entry]

RMC: Great post! I concer with your points and have grown "increasingly skeptical" of Presi--[entry]